general shape

Viewing 1 post (of 1 total)
  • Author
  • #2746 Score: 0
    Thibo Van Doninck

    I don’t immediately see how else we should describe a general shape of a nucleus in this case. The advantage of doing this with the multipole expansion is that the moments are small enough that we can use perturbation theory. My guess is that describing the shape in a different way we might end up with bigger contributions making it harder to apply perturbation theory.

Viewing 1 post (of 1 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.